Skip to content

A Better Way to Set Strategic Priorities

Instead of rank-ordering tasks, which breeds turf wars, balance three variables, objectives, resources, and timing, with resources as the deciding factor.

Leadership isn’t just about setting goals—it's about making tough decisions, especially when resources are limited. Prioritizing is key, but there’s a smarter way to approach it than simply rank-ordering tasks. Here's a method that not only makes sense but also avoids internal conflict and boosts team morale. 🚀


Why Rank Ordering Fails ❌

Rank ordering may seem straightforward, but it can lead to frustration, demotivation, and even turf wars among teams. When every team thinks their project is most important, tensions can flare. Instead of stacking priorities, focus on three crucial variables:

  1. Objectives: What are you trying to achieve?
  2. Resources: What resources do you have at your disposal?
  3. Timing: How much time do you have to get things done?

These elements work like the legs of a tripod—if you alter one, you need to adjust the others.


The Power of Resources 💼

Of these three, resources are king. No matter how great your objective or how urgent the timeline, without the necessary resources, your initiative won’t get far. When allocating resources, leaders must decide which projects are:

  • Critical
  • Important
  • Desirable

The Three Types of Strategic Priorities

Let’s break down these categories:

1. Critical Priorities 🚨

These are the must-do projects. If they’re not completed by a specific deadline, the consequences are severe. If you label something as critical, you're essentially writing a blank check, meaning it must be fully resourced—no exceptions.

  • Example: A company must secure a major contract or risk losing significant revenue. If this is declared a critical priority, all other resources can be drawn upon to ensure success.

2. Important Priorities 🔑

These are significant but allow some flexibility in either time or scope. Resources for important priorities are fixed, but you might adjust the objective or timeline to fit within what’s available.

  • Example: A company wants to implement new software. They can fix the resources but allow for flexibility in terms of the time it takes to complete the task.

3. Desirable Priorities 📈

These are projects that are nice to have but aren’t immediately crucial. Both resources and time are variable here, so they only move forward when there's extra capacity.

  • Example: Installing a software upgrade when your top teams aren’t busy with other critical tasks.

Allocating Resources for Success 🔄

Once you’ve categorized your projects, it’s time to allocate resources. Here’s how to go about it:

Step 1: List Your Resources 📝

Write down all the resources you have—people, budget, equipment, etc.

Step 2: Identify Your Projects 📊

List all the potential initiatives you want to tackle along with any time constraints.

Step 3: Allocate Resources 💼

Distribute your resources among the projects, but remember that critical priorities come first. You may need to pull resources from desirable projects when necessary.

Step 4: Create a Strategy Matrix 🎯

Now that you’ve allocated resources, use a matrix to visualize who’s doing what and how flexible each project is in terms of time or objectives.


The Transparent Allocation Method 🔍

When resources are allocated transparently, it fosters alignment and reduces conflict. Managers understand that moving resources around doesn’t lower their status; instead, they’re contributing to the company’s most critical objectives. By focusing on these clear categories—critical, important, and desirable—you avoid the pitfalls of rank ordering while building a stronger, more collaborative team.

Originally published on LinkedIn .

Amr Elharony
Delivery Lead, Mentor, FinTech Author & Speaker — bridging banking and technology to deliver measurable digital transformation across MENA.

Discussion 0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
3 min left